Three Seas Forum

the archives

dusted off in read-only


Akka posted 07 July 2006 in The Thousandfold ThoughtAkka by shockwave, Candidate

I do not agree that Achamian has turned to the Consult.
In a moment of utter weakness, and feeling defeated, while under strain from a Chorea near his chest, he revealed the location of Kellhus to Cnaiur.
I do not contest this is treason. But that is far from turning to someone/thing. He does not applaud (as of yet) the Consult´s goals, nor is he working with them, actively, to achieve the No-God´s resurrection/re-appearance.
Achamian was led by emotions. Emotions made him betray Kellhus in a way he [Kellhus] did not foresee. The probability trance did not predict this, i think.
It is, IMHO, not surprising that Kellhus was betrayed because of the very concept he has become subject to himself by hang-me-high-on-the-tree incident. The concept he has to master within himself now.
Or something like that. Im rambling.

edit. Ontopic: I think Achamiam will try to hide/turn away from the world. For a while. But if he will succeed i do not know.
After that he might become a sort of reluctant aide, working behind the scenes or with obvious resent in order to prevent the second apocalypse. view post


The Three Seas Forum archives are hosted and maintained courtesy of Jack Brown