Three Seas Forum

the archives

dusted off in read-only


On The Warrior Prophet posted 27 June 2004 in Philosophy DiscussionOn The Warrior Prophet by Anonymous, Subdidact

I can't remember the specifics of the SI critiques, but on the basis of your description of the debate, I'll definitely keep the door open on psi. Given the success of the etiological picture of the world that science has sketched for us, and the tendentiousness that seems to invariably dog research into the paranormal, I have to say I'm pessemistic. At the very least, the burden of proof lies with the psi realists. Backwards causality at the level of dried goods? Claims that big require exhaustive experimentation and review.

A couple quick questions regarding your idealism: 1) What do you make of the intentionality or aboutness of experience? and 2) Given that we all have perspectives, just what would you say our perspective is on? view post


The Three Seas Forum archives are hosted and maintained courtesy of Jack Brown